Is the SKS sufficient enough for rural survival?
- Junk Yard Dog
- Owner/Founder
- Posts: 48810
- Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 12:54 pm
- Location: New York
Re: Is the SKS sufficient enough for rural survival?
It's not the number of rounds, it's how well they are placed. Some people when confronted by an angry bear may fire all ten rounds and miss with all ten because they are shaking and unable to control either the weapon or themselves . That goes for someone who is packing a .405 Winchester as well. A friend of mine killed a bear with a .38 snub, he was taken by surprise, but he kept his head, and knew his only hope was an eye shot, and he did just that. People today are obsessed with powerful firearms as if they were the cure all for lack of skill, men 170 years ago killed bears with caplock Hawken single shot muzzleloaders, shortly before that they did it with flintlock muskets. Part of that was they simply had bigger balls than we do, but skill played a big part.
Leave it as it is. The ages have been at work on it and man can only mar it.
Don't hit at all if it is honorably possible to avoid hitting; but never hit soft.
Theodore Roosevelt
Don't hit at all if it is honorably possible to avoid hitting; but never hit soft.
Theodore Roosevelt
Re: Is the SKS sufficient enough for rural survival?
Would those have been swaged or cast?Junk Yard Dog wrote:...Part of that was they simply had bigger balls than we do...
I guess .451 is too small, huh?
"The saving of our world from pending doom will come, not through the complacent adjustment of the conforming majority, but through the creative maladjustment of a nonconforming minority.” - Martin Luther King, Jr.
- Junk Yard Dog
- Owner/Founder
- Posts: 48810
- Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 12:54 pm
- Location: New York
Re: Is the SKS sufficient enough for rural survival?
They are for my Ruger Old Army
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
Leave it as it is. The ages have been at work on it and man can only mar it.
Don't hit at all if it is honorably possible to avoid hitting; but never hit soft.
Theodore Roosevelt
Don't hit at all if it is honorably possible to avoid hitting; but never hit soft.
Theodore Roosevelt
-
- Posts: 904
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 7:17 pm
Re: Is the SKS sufficient enough for rural survival?
I think I would want a 7.62x54R for a really big wild hog. I've shot the small ones with my 7.62x39 AK and SKS and stopped them with one shot. But those damn big ones have so much fat you must hit the sweet spot or be prepared to unload cause they are very fast and wild crazy when wounded.If thy have piglets they are twice as dangerous ,even when hit in a vital spot unless you have a big ,fast bullet.
- Junk Yard Dog
- Owner/Founder
- Posts: 48810
- Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 12:54 pm
- Location: New York
Re: Is the SKS sufficient enough for rural survival?
That's why you should bring a friend along and have him armed with a 12 gauge packing slug, or a large bore rifle for backup.
Leave it as it is. The ages have been at work on it and man can only mar it.
Don't hit at all if it is honorably possible to avoid hitting; but never hit soft.
Theodore Roosevelt
Don't hit at all if it is honorably possible to avoid hitting; but never hit soft.
Theodore Roosevelt