neal45 wrote:I agree that the price was a little high but it was nice and someone added a Mosin they really wanted to their collection. Sure it is a refurb; but a somewhat rare variation not related to the modern refurbs and now generally attributed to Bulgaria. (So what we have been calling a "Czech Stock" may more accurately be called a "Bulgarian Stock." )
Are you saying that box 17 and box 20 stampings are Bulgarian? There is one individual on the other forum who boisterously insists these are Bulgarian but I have yet to see any documentation from him other than some obscure reference to bill of ladings or hearsay that had these guns going through Bulgaria at the most. Circle T Bulgarian because it has been seen on one subsequent Bulgarian semi auto rifle? I've got a circle 10 on a Mosin 91/30 that came in an Albanian stock. KK/10 stampings attributed to Bulgaria too? You just don't find them on the receivers... They can be anywhere, even on the rear sights indicating to me that there was some collaboration perhaps. My conclusion from all of this is that no one knows and no one will likely ever know the exact origin of these guns. I confess that I know that I don't know... Russia isn't talking and those unidentified individuals who actually worked on these projects (incl the 91/59 program) are fading away along with their knowledge. Many times "truth" comes from those who yell the loudest.
Show me the proof. It's really that simple. Some people seem to just "make it up as they go" or quote old internet pages that are so out of date it is sad. But, if anyone has a stitch of proof, show it and I'm all over it.
Problem is, the Soviet Block (CCCP) are tight lipped and would not release anything. The countries that made the Soviets up have better things to do (today) then waste their time trying to figure out what happened years ago. The info may be out there and some day released. But for right now, I don't see much "proof" anywhere.
Theories just don't cut it for me. Theories is another word for a guess. There are a few indicators that point at certain countries, but nothing solid.
This is just my opinion, and I don't accept anything till I see "proof".
neal45 wrote:I agree that the price was a little high but it was nice and someone added a Mosin they really wanted to their collection. Sure it is a refurb; but a somewhat rare variation not related.........
Just for the record......
Technically, they are not a "refurb"......... M91/30's and M38's, and M44 that were sold the last few years are "refurbished". The M91/38 was made from M91's into a different model (M91/38). There are no M91/38's that were "refurbished". They were finished when converted from M91's in the same fashion that the refurbs were.
I think Jim might be on to something too. Who knows. "Make Work Jobs" were common in the days that these rifles were made. Sort of like in the days of the depression here (the WPA).