Is this a real 1943 PU Scope??
Is this a real 1943 PU Scope??
Gentlemen,
On my Mosin Nagant, I was pretty convinced that I had an original scope. Having done research on PU scopes, I’ve learned that nothing like my gloss-black painted scope EVER came out of any factory. Through the black paint, I could see markings that appeared original. Learning that judiciously applied acetone won’t disturb original bluing, I took to the task of trying to clean the paint off my PU scope. Only to find that, underneath the paint, it appears…. Well, I’m not sure it appears to be. I’m not an aficionado here like you fellas are, but my guess is that, at some point, it was in pretty bad shape and someone wire-wheeled it down to bare metal (see pics, below), and then painted it black. The markings look authentic to me. They look as though they were retraced with an electro-pencil (probably after the scope was wire-wheeled), for the purposes of wanting to still be able to see them under a layer of paint. But, what the hell do I know? I haven’t finished removing the paint, yet, BUT; Would anyone kindly consider looking at these pictures and tell me you think is going on? I’ll surely be disappointed if I learn this thing’s fake. But hey - I’m not squatting over a hole in northern Iraq right now, am I??
I sincerely appreciate anyone’s thoughts.
On my Mosin Nagant, I was pretty convinced that I had an original scope. Having done research on PU scopes, I’ve learned that nothing like my gloss-black painted scope EVER came out of any factory. Through the black paint, I could see markings that appeared original. Learning that judiciously applied acetone won’t disturb original bluing, I took to the task of trying to clean the paint off my PU scope. Only to find that, underneath the paint, it appears…. Well, I’m not sure it appears to be. I’m not an aficionado here like you fellas are, but my guess is that, at some point, it was in pretty bad shape and someone wire-wheeled it down to bare metal (see pics, below), and then painted it black. The markings look authentic to me. They look as though they were retraced with an electro-pencil (probably after the scope was wire-wheeled), for the purposes of wanting to still be able to see them under a layer of paint. But, what the hell do I know? I haven’t finished removing the paint, yet, BUT; Would anyone kindly consider looking at these pictures and tell me you think is going on? I’ll surely be disappointed if I learn this thing’s fake. But hey - I’m not squatting over a hole in northern Iraq right now, am I??
I sincerely appreciate anyone’s thoughts.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Re: Is this a real 1943 PU Scope??
Progress update; Reluctantly decided to remove the scope from its mount and continue removing paint. It’s pretty obvious it’s either a knock-off or an original that was heavily wire-wheeled and repainted.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Re: Is this a real 1943 PU Scope??
More paint removed. For your collective perusal.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Re: Is this a real 1943 PU Scope??
All paint removed. I can still see some original bluing on the end-pieces and the overall assembly now doesn’t have the “wire-wheeled” look to me, anymore. I’d sincerely your thoughts on whether this is a real scope or a knock-off of some sort. Help?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- Miller Tyme
- PE - PEM - PU
- Posts: 1996
- Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2011 2:24 pm
Re: Is this a real 1943 PU Scope??
Paint was most certainly used on scopes, as well as other blued parts on Mosins during refurbishment, usually to help protect scratched, damaged, or thinning bluing.
“The only real power comes out of a long rifle" - Joseph Stalin
- Darryl
- Sniper Expert
- Posts: 6176
- Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2011 12:33 pm
- Location: Northern California
- Contact:
Re: Is this a real 1943 PU Scope??
Well, as you now can see, removing the paint was not a great idea.
Parts were often "painted" instead of re-bluing a parts. Especially on a scope.
It would be a very difficult just to "re-blue" a scope, so they just ..... painted them.
Wish someone would have got to you sooner.
Oh, and it is an original scope.
Darryl
Parts were often "painted" instead of re-bluing a parts. Especially on a scope.
It would be a very difficult just to "re-blue" a scope, so they just ..... painted them.
Wish someone would have got to you sooner.
Oh, and it is an original scope.
Darryl
Re: Is this a real 1943 PU Scope??
Paint and parkerizing indeed protect weapons and equipment from the elements. I have no regret having removed the substandard paint job from this scope as the weapon lives in a humidity controlled vault. It now looks soldierly and - most importantly - as original. There remains sufficient bluing (might not be evident in the pictures) that, with a light coat of CLP, there’s virtually no likelihood it’ll rust. Don’t be afraid to remove old paint. Just maintain your weapon as the OEM directs.
-
- Posts: 3126
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 7:53 pm
- Location: Western PA
Re: Is this a real 1943 PU Scope??
Well when the old paint is correct as how it left government usage/storage then yeah, no bueno IMO. A collector should ABSOLUTELY be afraid of removing paint or anything else until they are positive it's not a correct finish and then go from there. Lots and lots of nice surplus firearms and equipment turn up altered/degraded/refinished or what have you in an attempt to improve the correctness only to find out they did the opposite. Be patient, be informed before altering.
On Facebook? Check out the non-sporter preservationist group at: OOOPS. Deleted by Facebook because it's evil to even discuss collectible firearms on social media these days.
Re: Is this a real 1943 PU Scope??
I was informed enough to know that 1) it didn’t originally leave the factory that way, and, 2) high-gloss black wasn’t a color option for post-war refurbished scopes, according to 9130.info. (Shiny, glossy stuff on a sniper rifle just kind of defeats the purpose, no?). You fellas are acting like I just sporterized and checkered the stock of the Carcano that killed President Kennedy.
-
- Posts: 3126
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 7:53 pm
- Location: Western PA
Re: Is this a real 1943 PU Scope??
I was just addressing your statement about don't be afraid to remove old paint. Not very good general advise to give in a collecting field where paint is fairly common and correct.
On Facebook? Check out the non-sporter preservationist group at: OOOPS. Deleted by Facebook because it's evil to even discuss collectible firearms on social media these days.