Is this 1939 PU sniper an original?

All Military Snipers are discussed here!


Preservation forum, please no altered military surplus rifles or discussions on altering in this forum. Please read the rules at the top of each forum.
Post Reply
almartz68
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 4:26 pm

Is this 1939 PU sniper an original?

Post by almartz68 »

Hello, I am a newbie as far as Mosin Nagants go. I have done lots of research tho. I recently went to a local store and found a 1939 Mosin Nagant PU sniper rifle. In my research I have read that PU snipers didnt start until about 1942 (I think that is right). Anyway, I was wondering if it is a fake and is just an infantry gun with a PU scope added to make it a sniper. The 7 digit serial that is on my 1944 Izhevsk ex-sniper on left of receiver is NOT present on this 1939 Izhevsk PU sniper.
I am posting photos of the receiver and scope. What do you think. Is it an original? Thanks.
Al
User avatar
Rongo
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 6572
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2011 6:39 pm
Location: Variable in my specific position of physical space

Re: Is this 1939 PU sniper an original?

Post by Rongo »

Sorry to burst your bubble but....

But hey, Welcome to the Forum! :D
"Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it". Mark Twain

"Dang that entropy"
User avatar
Miller Tyme
PE - PEM - PU
PE - PEM - PU
Posts: 1998
Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2011 2:24 pm

Re: Is this 1939 PU sniper an original?

Post by Miller Tyme »

It's a fake, a 91/30 with a reproduction scope added to it.
“The only real power comes out of a long rifle" - Joseph Stalin
Gleedaniel13
Posts: 18
Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2013 5:39 am
Contact:

Re: Is this 1939 PU sniper an original?

Post by Gleedaniel13 »

I recently went to a local store and found a 1939 Mosin Nagant PU sniper rifle.
I think it was a 1939 Mosin Nagant PU sniper rifle also but I am wrong since it is a fake. :oops:
almartz68
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 4:26 pm

Re: Is this 1939 PU sniper an original?

Post by almartz68 »

thanks everyone !
User avatar
Junk Yard Dog
Owner/Founder
Owner/Founder
Posts: 48818
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 12:54 pm
Location: New York

Re: Is this 1939 PU sniper an original?

Post by Junk Yard Dog »

Welcome to the board, the PU sniper came along in 1942, not 1939, fake.
Leave it as it is. The ages have been at work on it and man can only mar it.
Don't hit at all if it is honorably possible to avoid hitting; but never hit soft.
Theodore Roosevelt
BenedictGomez
Posts: 176
Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2013 9:29 pm

Re: Is this 1939 PU sniper an original?

Post by BenedictGomez »

If you see those flat screws on the scope, it's one of the easiest giveaways of a reproduction and/or fake (which I've always thought kindof odd, because you see it often, yet it should be one of the easiest things to fake).
noonanda
Posts: 3
Joined: Sat Nov 09, 2013 8:49 am
Location: California

Re: Is this 1939 PU sniper an original?

Post by noonanda »

Probably a Century arms rifle, what a shame.
"You see in this world theres two kinds of people my friend. Those with loaded guns, and those who dig... You Dig" Blondie from TGBU

"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if they made a difference in the world. The Marines don't have that problem.”
― Ronald Reagan
bcposton
Posts: 48
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 6:28 pm
Location: Arlington, TX

Re: Is this 1939 PU sniper an original?

Post by bcposton »

Shame built on a red /25\ as well...
User avatar
Darryl
Sniper Expert
Sniper Expert
Posts: 6176
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2011 12:33 pm
Location: Northern California
Contact:

Re: Is this 1939 PU sniper an original?

Post by Darryl »

Gashliquor wrote:
Miller Tyme wrote:It's a fake, a 91/30 with a reproduction scope added to it.

If PU sniper came along in 1942, What year did they end?.
Generally ....PU mount (1942 to 1963). Other countries made them also.
Post Reply