Search found 107 matches

by Ratnik
Tue Jan 25, 2022 1:51 pm
Forum: Collectible Mosin Nagant Forum
Topic: Unknown mark on barrel shank of Tula m91/30
Replies: 15
Views: 444

Re: Unknown mark on barrel shank of Tula m91/30

50 in a circle is a repair depot marking
by Ratnik
Sun Oct 31, 2021 7:52 am
Forum: Sniper Rifle Forum
Topic: Elevation threads for PU bracket
Replies: 2
Views: 192

Re: Elevation threads for PU bracket

According to PU mount drawings they are 6x0.5
by Ratnik
Mon Sep 27, 2021 9:19 am
Forum: Sniper Rifle Forum
Topic: Russian PU scope.
Replies: 2
Views: 232

Re: Russian PU scope.

It is not supposed to be in center. If scope is installed properly, reticle should centered at 900 meters distance setting
by Ratnik
Wed Jul 07, 2021 4:23 am
Forum: Sniper Rifle Forum
Topic: Original PU, non repro
Replies: 35
Views: 1686

Re: Original PU, non repro

There are quite a few Molot imports that have been determined to be original refurbished snipers Why "quite a few" and not "all"? I didn't saw any questionable Molot PU within the US yet, only heard talks that they are not legit with zero evidence I have plenty of evidence that ...
by Ratnik
Tue Jul 06, 2021 4:45 am
Forum: Sniper Rifle Forum
Topic: Original PU, non repro
Replies: 35
Views: 1686

Re: Original PU, non repro

SA1911a1 wrote: Sun Jul 04, 2021 6:49 am
There are quite a few Molot imports that have been determined to be original refurbished snipers
Why "quite a few" and not "all"? I didn't saw any questionable Molot PU within the US yet, only heard talks that they are not legit with zero evidence
by Ratnik
Fri May 07, 2021 7:23 am
Forum: Collectible Mosin Nagant Forum
Topic: 1925 Tula Question
Replies: 8
Views: 512

Re: 1925 Tula Question

From want I can find the last "Standard" Tula M91 was made in 1926, the last "Dragoon" M91 was made in 1932 or 1931 depending on which source you go with. I tell you, this stuff gets more confusing the more I read.... Yes, last infantry M91's were accepted in 1926, last dragoon ...
by Ratnik
Thu May 06, 2021 12:34 pm
Forum: Collectible Mosin Nagant Forum
Topic: 1925 Tula Question
Replies: 8
Views: 512

Re: 1925 Tula Question

Last year of production in the Tula plant for M91 was supposed to be in 1930. But, in 1930 they made zero M91's so really, they stopped in 1929. In 1930 Tula was tooling up for the new model M91/30, and M91 production was basically zero. So the last "Known" Tula M91's were made in 1929 an...
by Ratnik
Thu May 06, 2021 12:32 pm
Forum: Sniper Rifle Forum
Topic: Sniper rear sight
Replies: 5
Views: 252

Re: Sniper rear sight

Two side bevel is a postwar repair depot modification, was used on both regular and sniper rifles. Originally, bevel was from the top front sight. During the sighting process at the factory or in the field, the slider was grinded from the bottom to match the rear sight gauge for each individual rifl...
by Ratnik
Sun Feb 21, 2021 8:52 am
Forum: Collectible Mosin Nagant Forum
Topic: Receiver Marks
Replies: 11
Views: 309

Re: Receiver Marks

X in a diamond - poorly stamped XO marked. Unknown repair depot
by Ratnik
Sun Feb 21, 2021 8:47 am
Forum: Sniper Rifle Forum
Topic: PU sniper scope question ???
Replies: 26
Views: 931

Re: PU sniper scope question ???

Reddish color is typical to some factory No.297 scopes. Likely it is caused by metal composition (with Silicon presnce), because during regular reblue they remain reddish (like SVT bolts)
Bolt is factory No.74 Izhevsk production, just rough welding job
by Ratnik
Fri Nov 06, 2020 12:02 pm
Forum: Sniper Rifle Forum
Topic: Help needed please to verify PU scope
Replies: 6
Views: 455

Re: Help needed please to verify PU scope

All 1940 and 1941 (and partially 1942) scopes originally were issued for the SVT-40 snipers. Your scope is still calibrated for the SVT-40 ballistics
by Ratnik
Fri May 29, 2020 10:50 am
Forum: Collectible Mosin Nagant Forum
Topic: Weird markings on SVT 40.
Replies: 0
Views: 267

Re: Weird markings on SVT 40.

13 in oval is quality control marking from Arsenal No.1, which refurbished your SVT. Arsenal No.1 marking is present on the bridge - poorly stamped box and crossline.
Original factory markings are ground off, rifle was manufactured by Mednogorsk factory in 1942-1944
by Ratnik
Mon May 25, 2020 9:24 am
Forum: Sniper Rifle Forum
Topic: sniper rifle help?
Replies: 9
Views: 502

Re: sniper rifle help?

Just to make sure you understood Ratnik. This is not a military made "sniper rifle". It was done by civilians. To be a "sniper rifle", it had to be done by the military arsenals or purchased by a military for that purpose. Anything else would be a rifle with a scope added on. Ac...
by Ratnik
Mon May 25, 2020 8:35 am
Forum: Sniper Rifle Forum
Topic: sniper rifle help?
Replies: 9
Views: 502

Re: sniper rifle help?

Just to make sure you understood Ratnik. This is not a military made "sniper rifle". It was done by civilians. To be a "sniper rifle", it had to be done by the military arsenals or purchased by a military for that purpose. Anything else would be a rifle with a scope added on. Ac...
by Ratnik
Fri May 22, 2020 11:51 am
Forum: Sniper Rifle Forum
Topic: sniper rifle help?
Replies: 9
Views: 502

Re: sniper rifle help?

Hi!
It's a modern Ukrainian civil conversion, one of the few existing modifications. Some number of them was imported to the USA during past years
by Ratnik
Mon May 04, 2020 2:15 am
Forum: Collectible Mosin Nagant Forum
Topic: Just acquired a Remington made Mosin Nagant with some strange stampings
Replies: 9
Views: 615

Re: Just acquired a Remington made Mosin Nagant with some strange stampings

40 in box (currently it is strike out) is marking of the repair depot in Bryansk, Russia. Was used in 1930's.Capital Д is acceptance marking from the same depot https://www.m9130.info/repair-depot-markings Is that also why there is a "P" on the tang? I was told the "P" signifies...
by Ratnik
Sun May 03, 2020 2:24 am
Forum: Collectible Mosin Nagant Forum
Topic: Just acquired a Remington made Mosin Nagant with some strange stampings
Replies: 9
Views: 615

Re: Just acquired a Remington made Mosin Nagant with some strange stampings

40 in box (currently it is strike out) is marking of the repair depot in Bryansk, Russia. Was used in 1930's.Capital Д is acceptance marking from the same depot https://www.m9130.info/repair-depot-markings https://static.wixstatic.com/media/df55bd_cbbbe24689104f8a9a2ba85e814b4354~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_6...
by Ratnik
Sat Jan 11, 2020 3:46 am
Forum: Sniper Rifle Forum
Topic: Help with a Tulski import
Replies: 14
Views: 667

Re: Help with a Tulski import

It's not correct. П in circle (or O in circle) marking at the reciver or at any other part except barrel - pressure or strength test with a special device
by Ratnik
Sun Dec 01, 2019 6:27 am
Forum: Sniper Rifle Forum
Topic: PU Scope Date
Replies: 4
Views: 240

Re: PU Scope Date

It's from 2000'-2010'. Ukranian reproduction, "Photopribor"factory in Cherkasy.
Box with x marking is marking of the Arsenal #2 in Kiev (soviet period)
by Ratnik
Wed Nov 06, 2019 10:33 am
Forum: Collectible Mosin Nagant Forum
Topic: 91/30 Marking
Replies: 11
Views: 1594

Re: 91/30 Marking

BP124 is Yugo marking . 10 in circle (actualy these are russian "ОГ" letters) is Izhevsk factory military representative acceptance marking